st/mesa: keep track of saturated writes when eliminating dead code
It doesn't matter whether a write is saturated or not, in another implementation it might even have been a separate opcode. This code was most likely copied from the copy-propagation pass (where one does have to distinguish saturation). Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -4144,8 +4144,7 @@ glsl_to_tgsi_visitor::eliminate_dead_code(void)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(inst->dst); i++) {
|
||||
if (inst->dst[i].file == PROGRAM_TEMPORARY &&
|
||||
!inst->dst[i].reladdr &&
|
||||
!inst->saturate) {
|
||||
!inst->dst[i].reladdr) {
|
||||
for (int c = 0; c < 4; c++) {
|
||||
if (inst->dst[i].writemask & (1 << c)) {
|
||||
if (writes[4 * inst->dst[i].index + c]) {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user