In the C23 standard unreachable() is now a predefined function-like
macro in <stddef.h>
See https://android.googlesource.com/platform/bionic/+/HEAD/docs/c23.md#is-now-a-predefined-function_like-macro-in
And this causes build errors when building for C23:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
In file included from ../src/util/log.h:30,
from ../src/util/log.c:30:
../src/util/macros.h:123:9: warning: "unreachable" redefined
123 | #define unreachable(str) \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../src/util/macros.h:31:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/14/include/stddef.h:456:9: note: this is the location of the previous definition
456 | #define unreachable() (__builtin_unreachable ())
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
So don't redefine it with the same name, but use the name UNREACHABLE()
to also signify it's a macro.
Using a different name also makes sense because the behavior of the
macro was extending the one of __builtin_unreachable() anyway, and it
also had a different signature, accepting one argument, compared to the
standard unreachable() with no arguments.
This change improves the chances of building mesa with the C23 standard,
which for instance is the default in recent AOSP versions.
All the instances of the macro, including the definition, were updated
with the following command line:
git grep -l '[^_]unreachable(' -- "src/**" | sort | uniq | \
while read file; \
do \
sed -e 's/\([^_]\)unreachable(/\1UNREACHABLE(/g' -i "$file"; \
done && \
sed -e 's/#undef unreachable/#undef UNREACHABLE/g' -i src/intel/isl/isl_aux_info.c
Reviewed-by: Erik Faye-Lund <erik.faye-lund@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/36437>
Fix defect reported by Coverity Scan.
Evaluation order violation (EVALUATION_ORDER)
write_write_typo: In block_size_bits = block_size_bits = ((surf.u.gfx9.swizzle_mode >= ADDR_SW_256KB_Z_X) ? 18 : 16),
block_size_bits is written twice with the same value.
Fixes: 44eaf50a34 ("ac/surface/tests: cosmetic changes")
Signed-off-by: Vinson Lee <vlee@freedesktop.org>
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/26160>
This primarily tests that:
- multiple GPUs with the same GPU modifier parameters result
in the same tiling layout.
- The size & alignment calculations don't change for a given
modifier & image parameters.
It does this primarily based on addrlib. Radeonsi has used addrlib
for the retiling of displayable DCC for a while already, so the
DCC tiling should be pretty reliable.
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/6176>
Antonio Ospite