r600g: take into account kcache banks for bank swizzle check

Due to the changes for multiple kcache banks support, now we are assigning
final SRCx_SEL values for kcache access at the later stage, when building the
bytecode. So we need to take into account kcache banks to distinguish
the constants with the same address but different bank index.

Signed-off-by: Vadim Girlin <vadimgirlin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Vadim Girlin
2012-01-22 01:49:46 +04:00
committed by Dave Airlie
parent 60bf0f05b4
commit 840a342cd0
+2 -2
View File
@@ -671,7 +671,7 @@ static int check_vector(struct r600_bytecode *bc, struct r600_bytecode_alu *alu,
return r;
}
} else if (is_cfile(sel)) {
r = reserve_cfile(bc, bs, sel, elem);
r = reserve_cfile(bc, bs, (alu->src[src].kc_bank<<16) + sel, elem);
if (r)
return r;
}
@@ -698,7 +698,7 @@ static int check_scalar(struct r600_bytecode *bc, struct r600_bytecode_alu *alu,
const_count++;
}
if (is_cfile(sel)) {
r = reserve_cfile(bc, bs, sel, elem);
r = reserve_cfile(bc, bs, (alu->src[src].kc_bank<<16) + sel, elem);
if (r)
return r;
}