intel/tools: Don't hardcode notification register
Previously we parsed a src non-terminal but did nothing with it. Since the WAIT instruction is kind of weird, in that you have to give it the same notification subregister for both destination and source, and it always has an exec size of 1, let's parse a destination instead of a source. This way, we can parse a writemask rather than a swizzle in align16 mode, and easily convert the writemask to a swizzle to create the source register. Reviewed-by: Sagar Ghuge <sagar.ghuge@intel.com> Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/5956>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -883,15 +883,18 @@ ternaryopcodes:
|
||||
|
||||
/* Sync instruction */
|
||||
syncinstruction:
|
||||
WAIT execsize src instoptions
|
||||
WAIT execsize dst instoptions
|
||||
{
|
||||
brw_next_insn(p, $1);
|
||||
i965_asm_set_instruction_options(p, $4);
|
||||
brw_inst_set_exec_size(p->devinfo, brw_last_inst, $2);
|
||||
brw_set_default_access_mode(p, $4.access_mode);
|
||||
struct brw_reg src = brw_notification_reg();
|
||||
brw_set_dest(p, brw_last_inst, src);
|
||||
brw_set_src0(p, brw_last_inst, src);
|
||||
struct brw_reg dest = $3;
|
||||
dest.swizzle = brw_swizzle_for_mask(dest.writemask);
|
||||
if (dest.file != ARF || dest.nr != BRW_ARF_NOTIFICATION_COUNT)
|
||||
error(&@1, "WAIT must use the notification register\n");
|
||||
brw_set_dest(p, brw_last_inst, dest);
|
||||
brw_set_src0(p, brw_last_inst, dest);
|
||||
brw_set_src1(p, brw_last_inst, brw_null_reg());
|
||||
brw_inst_set_mask_control(p->devinfo, brw_last_inst, BRW_MASK_DISABLE);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1474,6 +1477,7 @@ dstoperandex_typed:
|
||||
| flagreg
|
||||
| ipreg
|
||||
| maskreg
|
||||
| notifyreg
|
||||
| performancereg
|
||||
| statereg
|
||||
;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1 +1 @@
|
||||
wait(1) n0<0,1,0>UD { align1 WE_all 1N };
|
||||
wait(1) n0<0>UD { align1 WE_all 1N };
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1 +1 @@
|
||||
wait(1) n0<0,1,0>UD { align1 WE_all 1N };
|
||||
wait(1) n0<0>UD { align1 WE_all 1N };
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user