CELL: fix stencil test bugs

Fixed a boneheaded error in the generation of SPU code that calculates
the results of the stencil test.  Basically, all the greater than/less than
calculations were exactly inverted: they were coded as though the
given comparison took the stencil value as a left-hand operand and the
reference value as a right-hand operand, but the actual semantics always
put the reference as the left-hand operand and the stencil as the right-hand
operand.

With this fix, tests/dinoshade runs, as do all the other Mesa tests
and samples that use stencil (and that don't use texture formats
unsupported by Cell).
This commit is contained in:
Robert Ellison
2008-11-12 12:23:52 -07:00
parent b44ec717c8
commit 44257a8e75
2 changed files with 15 additions and 12 deletions
@@ -1190,14 +1190,14 @@ gen_stencil_test(struct spe_function *f, const struct pipe_stencil_state *state,
}
break;
case PIPE_FUNC_GREATER:
case PIPE_FUNC_LESS:
if (state->value_mask == stencil_max_value) {
/* stencil_pass = fragment_mask & (s > reference) */
/* stencil_pass = fragment_mask & (reference < s) */
spe_compare_greater_uint(f, stencil_pass_reg, fbS_reg, state->ref_value);
spe_and(f, stencil_pass_reg, fragment_mask_reg, stencil_pass_reg);
}
else {
/* stencil_pass = fragment_mask & ((s&mask) > (reference&mask)) */
/* stencil_pass = fragment_mask & ((reference&mask) < (s & mask)) */
unsigned int tmp_masked_stencil = spe_allocate_available_register(f);
spe_and_uint(f, tmp_masked_stencil, fbS_reg, state->value_mask);
spe_compare_greater_uint(f, stencil_pass_reg, tmp_masked_stencil, state->value_mask & state->ref_value);
@@ -1206,7 +1206,7 @@ gen_stencil_test(struct spe_function *f, const struct pipe_stencil_state *state,
}
break;
case PIPE_FUNC_LESS:
case PIPE_FUNC_GREATER:
if (state->value_mask == stencil_max_value) {
/* stencil_pass = fragment_mask & (reference > s) */
/* There's no convenient Compare Less Than Immediate instruction, so
@@ -1233,9 +1233,9 @@ gen_stencil_test(struct spe_function *f, const struct pipe_stencil_state *state,
}
break;
case PIPE_FUNC_LEQUAL:
case PIPE_FUNC_GEQUAL:
if (state->value_mask == stencil_max_value) {
/* stencil_pass = fragment_mask & (s <= reference)
/* stencil_pass = fragment_mask & (reference >= s)
* = fragment_mask & ~(s > reference) */
spe_compare_greater_uint(f, stencil_pass_reg, fbS_reg, state->ref_value);
spe_andc(f, stencil_pass_reg, fragment_mask_reg, stencil_pass_reg);
@@ -1250,9 +1250,9 @@ gen_stencil_test(struct spe_function *f, const struct pipe_stencil_state *state,
}
break;
case PIPE_FUNC_GEQUAL:
case PIPE_FUNC_LEQUAL:
if (state->value_mask == stencil_max_value) {
/* stencil_pass = fragment_mask & (s >= reference) ]
/* stencil_pass = fragment_mask & (reference <= s) ]
* = fragment_mask & ~(reference > s) */
/* As above, we have to do this by loading a register */
unsigned int tmp_reg = spe_allocate_available_register(f);
@@ -1779,7 +1779,7 @@ gen_stencil_depth_test(struct spe_function *f,
* \param f the generated function (out)
*/
void
cell_gen_fragment_function(struct cell_context *cell, uint facing, struct spe_function *f)
cell_gen_fragment_function(struct cell_context *cell, const uint facing, struct spe_function *f)
{
const struct pipe_depth_stencil_alpha_state *dsa = cell->depth_stencil;
const struct pipe_blend_state *blend = cell->blend;
@@ -1813,7 +1813,7 @@ cell_gen_fragment_function(struct cell_context *cell, uint facing, struct spe_fu
if (cell->debug_flags & CELL_DEBUG_ASM) {
spe_print_code(f, true);
spe_indent(f, 8);
spe_comment(f, -4, "Begin per-fragment ops");
spe_comment(f, -4, facing == CELL_FACING_FRONT ? "Begin front-facing per-fragment ops": "Begin back-facing per-fragment ops");
}
spe_allocate_register(f, x_reg);
@@ -2092,6 +2092,9 @@ cell_gen_fragment_function(struct cell_context *cell, uint facing, struct spe_fu
spe_release_register(f, quad_offset_reg);
if (cell->debug_flags & CELL_DEBUG_ASM) {
spe_comment(f, -4, "End per-fragment ops");
char buffer[1024];
sprintf(buffer, "End %s-facing per-fragment ops: %d instructions",
facing == CELL_FACING_FRONT ? "front" : "back", f->num_inst);
spe_comment(f, -4, buffer);
}
}
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
extern void
cell_gen_fragment_function(struct cell_context *cell, uint facing, struct spe_function *f);
cell_gen_fragment_function(struct cell_context *cell, const uint facing, struct spe_function *f);
#endif /* CELL_GEN_FRAGMENT_H */