Revert "i965: Don't add barrier deps for FB write messages."
This reverts commit d0e1d6b7e2.
The change in the vec4 code is a mistake -- there's never an
FS_OPCODE_FB_WRITE in vec4 code.
The change in the fs code had the (harmless) effect of not recognizing
an FB_WRITE as a scheduling barrier even if it was marked EOT --
harmless because the scheduler marked the last instruction of a block as
a barrier, something I'm changing in the following patches.
This will be reimplemented later in the series.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -939,9 +939,8 @@ fs_instruction_scheduler::calculate_deps()
|
||||
foreach_in_list(schedule_node, n, &instructions) {
|
||||
fs_inst *inst = (fs_inst *)n->inst;
|
||||
|
||||
if ((inst->opcode == FS_OPCODE_PLACEHOLDER_HALT ||
|
||||
inst->has_side_effects()) &&
|
||||
inst->opcode != FS_OPCODE_FB_WRITE)
|
||||
if (inst->opcode == FS_OPCODE_PLACEHOLDER_HALT ||
|
||||
inst->has_side_effects())
|
||||
add_barrier_deps(n);
|
||||
|
||||
/* read-after-write deps. */
|
||||
@@ -1183,7 +1182,7 @@ vec4_instruction_scheduler::calculate_deps()
|
||||
foreach_in_list(schedule_node, n, &instructions) {
|
||||
vec4_instruction *inst = (vec4_instruction *)n->inst;
|
||||
|
||||
if (inst->has_side_effects() && inst->opcode != FS_OPCODE_FB_WRITE)
|
||||
if (inst->has_side_effects())
|
||||
add_barrier_deps(n);
|
||||
|
||||
/* read-after-write deps. */
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user