st/nine: Fix CALLNZ implementation

Nothing seems to indicates the negation modifier would be stored in the
instruction flags instead of the source modifier. tx_src_param has
already handled it if it is in the source modifier.

In addition,
when the card supports native integers, the boolean
are stored in 32 bits int and are equal to
0 or 0xFFFFFFFF.

Given 0xFFFFFFFF is NaN if it was a float, better use
UIF than IF.

Reviewed-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Axel Davy <axel.davy@ens.fr>
This commit is contained in:
Axel Davy
2014-12-26 11:14:05 +01:00
committed by Emil Velikov
parent 6378d74937
commit 30704bbc6e
@@ -1427,17 +1427,12 @@ DECL_SPECIAL(CALL)
DECL_SPECIAL(CALLNZ)
{
struct ureg_program *ureg = tx->ureg;
struct ureg_dst tmp = tx_scratch_scalar(tx);
struct ureg_src src = tx_src_param(tx, &tx->insn.src[1]);
/* NOTE: source should be const bool, so we can use NOT/SUB instead of [U]SNE 0 */
if (!tx->insn.flags) {
if (tx->native_integers)
ureg_NOT(ureg, tmp, src);
else
ureg_SUB(ureg, tmp, ureg_imm1f(ureg, 1.0f), src);
}
ureg_IF(ureg, tx->insn.flags ? src : tx_src_scalar(tmp), tx_cond(tx));
if (!tx->native_integers)
ureg_IF(ureg, src, tx_cond(tx));
else
ureg_UIF(ureg, src, tx_cond(tx));
ureg_CAL(ureg, &tx->inst_labels[tx->insn.src[0].idx]);
tx_endcond(tx);
ureg_ENDIF(ureg);