glsl_to_tgsi: fix a bug in eliminate_dead_code_advanced()
The bug, reported to me by Vadim Girlin on IRC, was causing overzealous
elimination of code in parallel if statements such as the following:
if (x) {
r = false;
}
if (y) {
r = true;
}
Before this commit, the assignment inside the first if block would be
misdetected as dead code and removed.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -3514,25 +3514,23 @@ glsl_to_tgsi_visitor::eliminate_dead_code_advanced(void)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case TGSI_OPCODE_ENDIF:
|
||||
--level;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case TGSI_OPCODE_ELSE:
|
||||
/* Clear all channels written inside the preceding if block from the
|
||||
* write array, but leave those that were not touched.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* FIXME: This destroys opportunities to remove dead code inside of
|
||||
* IF blocks that are followed by an ELSE block.
|
||||
/* Promote the recorded level all channels written inside the preceding
|
||||
* if or else block to the level above the if/else block.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
for (int r = 0; r < this->next_temp; r++) {
|
||||
for (int c = 0; c < 4; c++) {
|
||||
if (!writes[4 * r + c])
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (write_level[4 * r + c] >= level)
|
||||
writes[4 * r + c] = NULL;
|
||||
if (write_level[4 * r + c] == level)
|
||||
write_level[4 * r + c] = level-1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if(inst->op == TGSI_OPCODE_ENDIF)
|
||||
--level;
|
||||
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case TGSI_OPCODE_IF:
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user