winsys/amdgpu: merge loops decrementing num_active_ioctls & unreferencing bufs

We have 2 separate loops doing that. num_active_ioctls was decremented
in amdgpu_cs_submit_ib, while buffers were unreferenced
in amdgpu_cs_context_cleanup immediately after it.

Split unreferencing buffers from amdgpu_cs_context_cleanup, so that it's
not done in amdgpu_cs_submit_ib, which will do it in the same loop where
num_active_ioctls is unreferenced.

Reviewed-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/27060>
This commit is contained in:
Marek Olšák
2024-01-07 14:44:48 -05:00
committed by Marge Bot
parent f1cf7f0d86
commit 1e06cdad0d
+22 -10
View File
@@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ static void cleanup_fence_list(struct amdgpu_fence_list *fences)
fences->num = 0;
}
static void amdgpu_cs_context_cleanup(struct amdgpu_winsys *ws, struct amdgpu_cs_context *cs)
static void amdgpu_cs_context_cleanup_buffers(struct amdgpu_winsys *ws, struct amdgpu_cs_context *cs)
{
for (unsigned i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cs->buffer_lists); i++) {
struct amdgpu_cs_buffer *buffers = cs->buffer_lists[i].buffers;
@@ -886,7 +886,10 @@ static void amdgpu_cs_context_cleanup(struct amdgpu_winsys *ws, struct amdgpu_cs
cs->buffer_lists[i].num_buffers = 0;
}
}
static void amdgpu_cs_context_cleanup(struct amdgpu_winsys *ws, struct amdgpu_cs_context *cs)
{
cs->seq_no_dependencies.valid_fence_mask = 0;
cleanup_fence_list(&cs->fence_dependencies);
cleanup_fence_list(&cs->syncobj_dependencies);
@@ -897,6 +900,7 @@ static void amdgpu_cs_context_cleanup(struct amdgpu_winsys *ws, struct amdgpu_cs
static void amdgpu_destroy_cs_context(struct amdgpu_winsys *ws, struct amdgpu_cs_context *cs)
{
amdgpu_cs_context_cleanup_buffers(ws, cs);
amdgpu_cs_context_cleanup(ws, cs);
for (unsigned i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cs->buffer_lists); i++)
FREE(cs->buffer_lists[i].buffers);
@@ -1621,17 +1625,23 @@ cleanup:
cs->error_code = r;
/* Only decrement num_active_ioctls for those buffers where we incremented it. */
for (i = 0; i < initial_num_real_buffers; i++)
p_atomic_dec(&cs->buffer_lists[AMDGPU_BO_REAL].buffers[i].bo->num_active_ioctls);
/* Clear the buffer lists. */
for (unsigned list = 0; list < ARRAY_SIZE(cs->buffer_lists); list++) {
struct amdgpu_cs_buffer *buffers = cs->buffer_lists[list].buffers;
unsigned num_buffers = cs->buffer_lists[list].num_buffers;
/* Only decrement num_active_ioctls for those buffers where we incremented it. */
unsigned num_dec_buffers = list == AMDGPU_BO_REAL ? initial_num_real_buffers : num_buffers;
unsigned i;
unsigned num_slab_buffers = cs->buffer_lists[AMDGPU_BO_SLAB_ENTRY].num_buffers;
for (i = 0; i < num_slab_buffers; i++)
p_atomic_dec(&cs->buffer_lists[AMDGPU_BO_SLAB_ENTRY].buffers[i].bo->num_active_ioctls);
for (i = 0; i < num_dec_buffers; i++) {
p_atomic_dec(&buffers[i].bo->num_active_ioctls);
amdgpu_winsys_bo_reference(ws, &buffers[i].bo, NULL);
}
for (; i < num_buffers; i++)
amdgpu_winsys_bo_reference(ws, &buffers[i].bo, NULL);
unsigned num_sparse_buffers = cs->buffer_lists[AMDGPU_BO_SPARSE].num_buffers;
for (i = 0; i < num_sparse_buffers; i++)
p_atomic_dec(&cs->buffer_lists[AMDGPU_BO_SPARSE].buffers[i].bo->num_active_ioctls);
cs->buffer_lists[list].num_buffers = 0;
}
amdgpu_cs_context_cleanup(ws, cs);
}
@@ -1749,6 +1759,8 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_flush(struct radeon_cmdbuf *rcs,
} else {
if (flags & RADEON_FLUSH_TOGGLE_SECURE_SUBMISSION)
cs->csc->secure = !cs->csc->secure;
amdgpu_cs_context_cleanup_buffers(ws, cs->csc);
amdgpu_cs_context_cleanup(ws, cs->csc);
}