build: avoid redefining unreachable() which is standard in C23
In the C23 standard unreachable() is now a predefined function-like macro in <stddef.h> See https://android.googlesource.com/platform/bionic/+/HEAD/docs/c23.md#is-now-a-predefined-function_like-macro-in And this causes build errors when building for C23: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- In file included from ../src/util/log.h:30, from ../src/util/log.c:30: ../src/util/macros.h:123:9: warning: "unreachable" redefined 123 | #define unreachable(str) \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from ../src/util/macros.h:31: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/14/include/stddef.h:456:9: note: this is the location of the previous definition 456 | #define unreachable() (__builtin_unreachable ()) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- So don't redefine it with the same name, but use the name UNREACHABLE() to also signify it's a macro. Using a different name also makes sense because the behavior of the macro was extending the one of __builtin_unreachable() anyway, and it also had a different signature, accepting one argument, compared to the standard unreachable() with no arguments. This change improves the chances of building mesa with the C23 standard, which for instance is the default in recent AOSP versions. All the instances of the macro, including the definition, were updated with the following command line: git grep -l '[^_]unreachable(' -- "src/**" | sort | uniq | \ while read file; \ do \ sed -e 's/\([^_]\)unreachable(/\1UNREACHABLE(/g' -i "$file"; \ done && \ sed -e 's/#undef unreachable/#undef UNREACHABLE/g' -i src/intel/isl/isl_aux_info.c Reviewed-by: Erik Faye-Lund <erik.faye-lund@collabora.com> Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/36437>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Marge Bot
parent
b4c7d3a08e
commit
ddf2aa3a4d
@@ -2859,7 +2859,7 @@ TEST_P(validation_test, gfx11_no_byte_src_1_2)
|
||||
brw_eu_inst_set_3src_a1_src1_hstride(&devinfo, last_inst, inst[i].srcs[0].hstride);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
unreachable("invalid opcode");
|
||||
UNREACHABLE("invalid opcode");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
brw_eu_inst_set_dst_hstride(&devinfo, last_inst, BRW_HORIZONTAL_STRIDE_1);
|
||||
@@ -3749,7 +3749,7 @@ TEST_P(validation_test, scalar_register_restrictions)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
default:
|
||||
unreachable("unexpected opcode in tests");
|
||||
UNREACHABLE("unexpected opcode in tests");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
brw_eu_inst_set_exec_size(&devinfo, last_inst, cvt(t.exec_size) - 1);
|
||||
@@ -3884,7 +3884,7 @@ TEST_P(validation_test, bfloat_restrictions)
|
||||
brw_MAD(p, t.dst, t.src0, t.src1, t.src2);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
unreachable("unexpected opcode in tests");
|
||||
UNREACHABLE("unexpected opcode in tests");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (tests[i].opcode == BRW_OPCODE_MAD) {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user