intel/compiler: Pass detailed dependency classes to invalidate_analysis()
Have fun reading through the whole back-end optimizer to verify whether I've missed any dependency flags -- Or alternatively, just trust that any mistake here will trigger an assertion failure during analysis pass validation if it ever poses a problem for the consistency of any of the analysis passes managed by the framework. Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4012>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Matt Turner
parent
65080dc8df
commit
ab6d792986
@@ -2029,7 +2029,7 @@ fs_visitor::split_virtual_grfs()
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_EVERYTHING);
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_INSTRUCTION_DETAIL | DEPENDENCY_VARIABLES);
|
||||
|
||||
delete[] split_points;
|
||||
delete[] new_virtual_grf;
|
||||
@@ -2074,7 +2074,7 @@ fs_visitor::compact_virtual_grfs()
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
remap_table[i] = new_index;
|
||||
alloc.sizes[new_index] = alloc.sizes[i];
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_EVERYTHING);
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_INSTRUCTION_DETAIL | DEPENDENCY_VARIABLES);
|
||||
++new_index;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -2537,7 +2537,7 @@ fs_visitor::lower_constant_loads()
|
||||
inst->remove(block);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_EVERYTHING);
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_INSTRUCTIONS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool
|
||||
@@ -2817,7 +2817,8 @@ fs_visitor::opt_algebraic()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (progress)
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_EVERYTHING);
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_INSTRUCTION_DATA_FLOW |
|
||||
DEPENDENCY_INSTRUCTION_DETAIL);
|
||||
|
||||
return progress;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -2868,7 +2869,7 @@ fs_visitor::opt_zero_samples()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (progress)
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_EVERYTHING);
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_INSTRUCTION_DETAIL);
|
||||
|
||||
return progress;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -2965,7 +2966,7 @@ fs_visitor::opt_sampler_eot()
|
||||
* flag and submit a header together with the sampler message as required
|
||||
* by the hardware.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_EVERYTHING);
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_INSTRUCTIONS | DEPENDENCY_VARIABLES);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3018,7 +3019,8 @@ fs_visitor::opt_register_renaming()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (progress) {
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_EVERYTHING);
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_INSTRUCTION_DETAIL |
|
||||
DEPENDENCY_VARIABLES);
|
||||
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(delta_xy); i++) {
|
||||
if (delta_xy[i].file == VGRF && remap[delta_xy[i].nr] != ~0u) {
|
||||
@@ -3066,7 +3068,7 @@ fs_visitor::opt_redundant_discard_jumps()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (progress)
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_EVERYTHING);
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_INSTRUCTIONS);
|
||||
|
||||
return progress;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -3260,7 +3262,7 @@ fs_visitor::compute_to_mrf()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (progress)
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_EVERYTHING);
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_INSTRUCTIONS);
|
||||
|
||||
return progress;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -3318,7 +3320,7 @@ fs_visitor::eliminate_find_live_channel()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (progress)
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_EVERYTHING);
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_INSTRUCTION_DETAIL);
|
||||
|
||||
return progress;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -3466,7 +3468,7 @@ fs_visitor::remove_duplicate_mrf_writes()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (progress)
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_EVERYTHING);
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_INSTRUCTIONS);
|
||||
|
||||
return progress;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -3515,7 +3517,7 @@ fs_visitor::remove_extra_rounding_modes()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (progress)
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_EVERYTHING);
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_INSTRUCTIONS);
|
||||
|
||||
return progress;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -3696,7 +3698,7 @@ fs_visitor::insert_gen4_send_dependency_workarounds()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (progress)
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_EVERYTHING);
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_INSTRUCTIONS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@@ -3736,7 +3738,7 @@ fs_visitor::lower_uniform_pull_constant_loads()
|
||||
inst->header_size = 1;
|
||||
inst->mlen = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_EVERYTHING);
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_INSTRUCTIONS | DEPENDENCY_VARIABLES);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/* Before register allocation, we didn't tell the scheduler about the
|
||||
* MRF we use. We know it's safe to use this MRF because nothing
|
||||
@@ -3854,7 +3856,7 @@ fs_visitor::lower_load_payload()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (progress)
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_EVERYTHING);
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_INSTRUCTIONS);
|
||||
|
||||
return progress;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -4154,7 +4156,7 @@ fs_visitor::lower_integer_multiplication()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (progress)
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_EVERYTHING);
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_INSTRUCTIONS | DEPENDENCY_VARIABLES);
|
||||
|
||||
return progress;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -4184,7 +4186,7 @@ fs_visitor::lower_minmax()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (progress)
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_EVERYTHING);
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_INSTRUCTIONS);
|
||||
|
||||
return progress;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -4273,7 +4275,7 @@ fs_visitor::lower_sub_sat()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (progress)
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_EVERYTHING);
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_INSTRUCTIONS | DEPENDENCY_VARIABLES);
|
||||
|
||||
return progress;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -5985,7 +5987,7 @@ fs_visitor::lower_logical_sends()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (progress)
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_EVERYTHING);
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_INSTRUCTIONS | DEPENDENCY_VARIABLES);
|
||||
|
||||
return progress;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -6870,7 +6872,7 @@ fs_visitor::lower_simd_width()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (progress)
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_EVERYTHING);
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_INSTRUCTIONS | DEPENDENCY_VARIABLES);
|
||||
|
||||
return progress;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -6951,7 +6953,7 @@ fs_visitor::lower_barycentrics()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (progress)
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_EVERYTHING);
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_INSTRUCTIONS | DEPENDENCY_VARIABLES);
|
||||
|
||||
return progress;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -7593,7 +7595,7 @@ fs_visitor::fixup_sends_duplicate_payload()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (progress)
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_EVERYTHING);
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_INSTRUCTIONS | DEPENDENCY_VARIABLES);
|
||||
|
||||
return progress;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -7616,7 +7618,8 @@ fs_visitor::fixup_3src_null_dest()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (progress)
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_EVERYTHING);
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_INSTRUCTION_DETAIL |
|
||||
DEPENDENCY_VARIABLES);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@@ -7759,7 +7762,7 @@ fs_visitor::fixup_nomask_control_flow()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (progress)
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_EVERYTHING);
|
||||
invalidate_analysis(DEPENDENCY_INSTRUCTIONS | DEPENDENCY_VARIABLES);
|
||||
|
||||
return progress;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user