i965/fs: Don't [un]spill multiple registers at a time in SIMD8 mode

I thought this would be a clever way to make spilling less expensive.
However, it appears that the oword read/write messages we are using for
spilling ignore the execution size and assume SIMD16 whenever working with
more than one register.

Reviewed-by: Kristian Høgsberg <krh@bitplanet.net>
This commit is contained in:
Jason Ekstrand
2014-10-24 11:37:55 -07:00
parent 3a5df8b612
commit 76bb695f09
@@ -688,8 +688,10 @@ fs_visitor::emit_unspill(bblock_t *block, fs_inst *inst, fs_reg dst,
uint32_t spill_offset, int count)
{
int reg_size = 1;
if (count % 2 == 0)
if (dispatch_width == 16 && count % 2 == 0) {
reg_size = 2;
dst.width = 16;
}
for (int i = 0; i < count / reg_size; i++) {
/* The gen7 descriptor-based offset is 12 bits of HWORD units. */
@@ -722,7 +724,7 @@ fs_visitor::emit_spill(bblock_t *block, fs_inst *inst, fs_reg src,
{
int reg_size = 1;
int spill_base_mrf = 14;
if (count % 2 == 0) {
if (dispatch_width == 16 && count % 2 == 0) {
spill_base_mrf = 13;
reg_size = 2;
}